Individuality which, by the action of Ignorance, becomes in us at a lower levelĬompare here the parable of the Blind Men and the Elephant, and the esoteric-exoteric demarcation in the Traditionalism of Frithjof Schuon. So as to support the manifestation of the Many in One and One in Many the thirdįurther modifies it so as to support the evolution of a diversified The first founds the inalienable unity of things, the second modifies that unity

Has three such general poises or sessions of its world-founding consciousness.

We find that in the principle of supermind itself it Nor so limited it can be many things at a time and take more than one enduring But the Divine Consciousness is not so particularised, The past out of our ken, or not yet true, because it is waiting in the futureĪnd not yet in our ken. The rest is either not true or no longer true, because it has disappeared into Thing at a time, one formation, one poise of being, one aggregate of experience Īnd that one thing is for us the truth of ourselves which we acknowledge all Phenomenally a particular form of consciousness, subject to Time and Space, andĬan only be, in our surface consciousness which is all we know of ourselves, one The Supermind is not uniform andf unchanging throughout, but consists of different aspects or Poises. An admittedly rather simplistic representation of the three Supramental Poises, in relation to both unmanifest Sachchidananda and the manifest cosmos.

3 principles supermind